Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
We recently launched a new web page on the EQUATOR website describing EQUATOR Oncology which will produce online resources and guidance for researchers in the field of oncology Read More18/09/2015 Improving trial reporting: a Q and A with Isabelle Boutron and introduction to the COBWEB tool
Deputy Editor Claire Barnard talks to Isabelle Boutron about her research article published recently in BMC Medicine. Isabelle and her colleagues demonstrate that the COBWEB writing aid tool can improve the completeness of clinical trial reporting. Here, Prof Boutron answers our … Read More14/08/2015 First EQUATOR Publication School a resounding success
The first cohort of the EQUATOR Publication School (6-10 July 2015) had goals many researchers can identify with: develop confidence in writing, fill in the gaps in a self-taught writer’s training, polish skills so as best to pass them on … Read More31/03/2015 Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Evaluating 10 years of STARD
Daniël A. Korevaar & Jérémie F. Cohen, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands Over 250 reporting guidelines are currently available in the EQUATOR library. One of the most established of these is the STARD … Read More16/03/2015 Reducing publication bias in animal research
Elizabeth Moylan, Senior Editor at BioMed Central, writes about publication bias in animal research, the importance of publishing negative results, and the role of preclinical study registration. But is there a one-size solution that could fit all? This week the … Read More23/01/2015 Planning a systematic review? Think protocols
While much of the focus on reducing waste in research has been on primary studies, in particular clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta analyses can compound the problem. Here, Larissa Shamseer, PhD candidate … Read More06/01/2015 Introducing the Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis Initiative: The TRIPOD Statement
Gary Collins, Associate Professor and Deputy Director of the Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford introduces TRIPOD. Decisions based on clinical predictions are routinely made throughout medicine and at all stages in pathways of health care. For example, … Read More23/10/2014 Ginny Barbour: I’ve Got a (lot of) Little (check)lists
PLOS Medicine Editorial Director, Virginia Barbour, reflects on the publication of the CONSORT and PRISMA guidelines and reminds us of the importance of checklists to medical publishing. This blog was orginally published as one of eight in PLOS Medicine’s 10th Anniversary blog series on the most interesting … Read More12/08/2014 B.J. Visser: How much money do we waste on research?
It has been claimed that 85% of biomedical research is wasted because of inadequate production and reporting of research. This implies a considerable financial loss for society and industry Read More03/07/2014 E. Wager: Why aren’t researchers told about reporting guidelines?
Liz Wager reflects on a recent talk that she gave to postgraduate students at a careers day for biomedical researchers considering working in medical communications Read More
In a previous post detailing my time with the EQUATOR Network, I spoke about my work on the STrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. STROBE is one of the original “core” reporting guidelines which provides guidance...