Resources for editors and peer reviewers
The following resources will help you to produce high quality research publications:
Developing a journal's policies on research reporting
The following resources will be useful for developing or updating a journal's policies and instructions for research reporting:
- Guidelines developed by influential editorial groups (WAME, ICMJE, COPE, etc.)
- Research ethics, publication ethics and good practice guidelines
- Reporting guidelines
- Case studies: How journals implement reporting guidelines
- Editorials introducing reporting guidelines and new reporting policies into a journal
- Instructions to Authors (collected by the Mulford Library, University of Toledo; note that not all listed instructions provide good guidance on research reporting)
Guidance for peer reviewers
Reporting guidelines are useful tools for strengthening the peer review process. Here are a few examples of how to implement this in your journal:
Other resources
International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication (link to materials from all congresses held so far)
Nature Peer Review Debate (22 articles of analyses and perspectives from leading scientists, publishers and other stakeholders)
Hames, I. (2007) Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals. Guidelines for Good Practice. Blackwell Publishing
Godlee, F. and Jefferson, T. (Eds) (2003). Peer Review in Health Sciences (second edition). BMJ Books, London
Other books relevant to research publication selected by Council of Science Editors: http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/books/viewbooks.cfm
Explore also EQUATOR Links section
Do you want to write an editorial about EQUATOR?
If you are considering writing an editorial about the EQUATOR Network resources and activities you might find useful some of the EQUATOR publications.
********
This page is still under development
In the near future this page will bring you the useful information on
why and how to use reporting guidelines in the editorial process,
information about available online training modules and face-to-face
workshops, experience of other editors and peer reviewers with using
reporting guidelines, and much more.
We are committed to build a useful resource point and would be grateful to hear from you about what information you would find useful to have here (please email Iveta Simera).
You are welcome to register your interest and join our network of people interested in improving the quality of research reporting. There are no obligations or fees for joining the network
Page last edited: 19 January 2010
