- Resource Centre
- Library for health research reporting
- Reporting Guidelines
- Reporting guidelines under development
- Reporting guidelines in other research fields
- Guidance on scientific writing
- Guidance developed by editorial groups
- Industry sponsored research - additional guidance
- Research ethics, publication ethics and good practice guidelines
- Development and maintenance of reporting guidelines
- Editorials introducing RGs
- Examples of guidelines for peer reviewers
- Case studies: RG implementation
- Examples of good research reporting
- Presentations
- EQUATOR 'pick'
- Authors of research reports
- Editors and peer reviewers
- Reporting guidelines developers
- Promote responsible reporting
- Monitoring use of our resources
- Links
Reporting guidelines under development
The following guidelines are currently being developed:
- The SPIRIT initiative (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials)
- PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses Protocols)
- Guidelines for reporting the impact of patient and public involvement in research
- Guidelines for the reporting of prognostic (risk prediction) models
- WIDER recommendations for reporting of behaviour change interventions
- Guidelines for reporting biomedical images in scientific journals
- REporting Manualised INterventions for Dissemination and Evaluation (REMINDE) Statement
- CONSORT extension for reporting of health related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes from trials
- CONSORT extension for reporting randomised controlled trials of social interventions
- CENT (CONSORT Extension for N-of-1 Trials)
- PRISMA-extension for equity relevant reviews
- The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected Data (RECORD) statement
- STROBE checklist for conference abstracts
- CIRCLe SMT project (Consensus on Interventions Reporting Criteria List Spinal Manipulative Therapy)
- STROBE-RDS (Reporting guidelines for Respondent Driven Sampling studies)
SPIRIT initiative (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials)
The SPIRIT initiative aims to produce evidence-based recommendations for key information to include in a trial protocol
- The SPIRIT initiative: Defining Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials. Executive summary (August 2011)
- Read the BMJ blog about the third SPIRIT meeting held on 2 October 2010
- Strengthening the credibility of clinical research .The Lancet 2010;375: 1225. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60523-5 (Read the editorial)
- Chan, A-W; Tetzlaff, J; Altman, DG; Gotzsche, PC; Hrobjartsson, A, et al. The SPIRIT initiative: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Randomized Trials [conference abstract] German J Evid Quality Health Care (suppl). 2008;102:S27
- Contact: An-Wen Chan, Chair of the SPIRIT initiative, anwen.chan@utoronto.ca
PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses Protocols)
PRISMA-P extends the PRISMA Statement to provide guidance for optimal reporting of systematic review protocols. A consensus meeting was held in June 2011 and the guidance is expected to be available on EQUATOR in 2012.
- Read about the importance of prospective registration of systematic review protocols
- Contact person Larissa Shamseer: lshamseer@ohri.ca
Guidelines for reporting the impact of patient and public involvement in research: Strengthening the evidence base of patient and public involvement
- Read the project summary (December 2010)
- Contact Dr Sophie Staniszewska: Sophie.staniszewska@warwick.ac.uk
Guidelines for the reporting of prognostic (risk prediction) models
- Contact Dr Gary Collins: gary.collins@csm.ox.ac.uk
- Read the BMJ blog about the guideline development meeting held in Oxford in June 2011
WIDER recommendations for reporting of behaviour change interventions
- Website: http://interventiondesign.co.uk/?page_id=9
- Contact: Charles Abraham, s.c.s.abraham@sussex.ac.uk
Guidelines for reporting biomedical images in scientific journals
- Lang, T. How to Document Biomedical Images for Publication (pdf)
- Contact: Tom Lang, tomlangcom@aol.com
- See also EQUATOR discussion forum - 'Developing Reporting Guidelines'
REporting Manualised INterventions for Dissemination and Evaluation (REMINDE) Statement
- Website: http://www.researchintorecovery.com/
- Contact: Dr Mike Slade, m.slade@iop.kcl.ac.uk
CONSORT extension for reporting of health related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes from trials
- Contact Melanie Calvert: consortqol@contacts.bham.ac.uk
- Read the BMJ blog about the HRQoL extension
- Read the comment published in the Lancet: PMID 22078674
CONSORT extension for reporting randomised controlled trials of social interventions
- Website: http://www.spi.ox.ac.uk/research/centre-for-evidence-based-intervention/consort-study.html
- Contact: CONSORT.study@spi.ox.ac.uk
CENT (CONSORT Extension for N-of-1 Trials)
An official extension of the CONSORT 2010 Statement is underway for reporting N-of-1 trials. This guidance provides a set of essential items to include when preparing reports of prospectively planned, multiple crossover single patient trials, which may or may not be randomized. The CENT guidance is expected to become available in late 2012.
- Read a letter to the editor in JAMA on the importance of N-of-1 trials
- Contact person Larissa Shamseer: lshamseer@ohri.ca
PRISMA-extension for equity relevant reviews
- Website: http://equity.cochrane.org/equity-extension-prisma
- Contact: Dr. Vivian Welch, vivian.welch@uottawa.ca
- Read the BMJ blog about this PRISMA extension which was posted on the 7 December 2011
- Read the PLoS blog posted on the 9 December 2011
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected Data (RECORD) statement
To develop reporting guidelines for observational studies using health data routinely collected for non-research purposes as an extension of the STROBE statement.
- Summary document (February 2012) including a project overview, main objectives and a call for stakeholders
- Contact: Eric Benchimol (ebenchimol@cheo.on.ca) or Sinead Langan (Sinead.Langan@lshtm.ac.uk)
STROBE checklist for conference abstracts
The STORBE Group have recently developed a checklist for conference abstracts. The draft STROBE checklist for abstracts is currently being piloted at the ECCMID conference.
- Download the draft checklist
- Provide feedback to the development group
- STROBE website: http://www.strobe-statement.org
CIRCLe SMT project (Consensus on Interventions Reporting Criteria List Spinal Manipulative Therapy)
Website: www.circle-smt.com
Contact: Ruud Groeneweg, info@circle-smt.com
STROBE-RDS (Reporting guidelines for Respondent Driven Sampling studies)
To develop guidelines for the reporting of Respondent Driven Sampling studies. Adapted from the STORBE guidelines for cross-sectional studies.
- Download version one of the draft checklist (Mar 2012)
- Provide feedback and/or register interest in attending the consensus-building reporting guidelines setting meeting by contacting Dr Richard White (Richard.White@lshtm.ac.uk) at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Please let us know about relevant projects; it will avoid duplication of the process and might also help you to find new collaborators.
Page last edited: 11 May 2012

