- Resource Centre
- Library for health research reporting
- Reporting Guidelines
- Experimental studies
- Observational studies
- Diagnostic accuracy studies
- Biospecimen reporting
- Reliability and agreement studies
- Systematic reviews and meta-analysis
- Qualitative research
- Mixed methods studies
- Economic evaluations
- Quality improvement studies
- Other reporting guidelines
- Reporting data
- Statistical methods and analyses
- Sections of research reports
- Specific conditions or procedures
- Reporting guidelines under development
- Reporting guidelines in other research fields
- Guidance on scientific writing
- Guidance developed by editorial groups
- Research funders' guidance on reporting requirements
- Industry sponsored research - additional guidance
- Research ethics, publication ethics and good practice guidelines
- Development and maintenance of reporting guidelines
- Editorials introducing RGs
- Examples of guidelines for peer reviewers
- Case studies: RG implementation
- Examples of good research reporting
- Presentations
- EQUATOR 'pick'
- Reporting Guidelines
- Authors of research reports
- Editors and peer reviewers
- Reporting guidelines developers
- Promote responsible reporting
- Monitoring use of our resources
- Links
Biospecimen reporting
| Reporting guidance provided for: | Name of guideline website (where available) | References including PMID |
|---|---|---|
| Biospecimen reporting |
BRISQ |
Moore HM, Kelly AB, Jewell SD, McShane LM, Clark DP, Greenspan R, Hayes DF, Hainaut P, Kim P, Mansfield EA, Potapova O, Riegman P, Rubinstein Y, Seijo E, Somiari S, Watson P, Weier HU, Zhu C, Vaught J. Biospecimen reporting for improved study quality (BRISQ). Cancer Cytopathol. 2011; 119(2):92-101. PMID: 21433001 |
Page last edited: 13 March 2012
