- Resource Centre
- Library for health research reporting
- Reporting Guidelines
- Experimental studies
- Observational studies
- Diagnostic accuracy studies
- Biospecimen reporting
- Reliability and agreement studies
- Systematic reviews and meta-analysis
- Qualitative research
- Mixed methods studies
- Economic evaluations
- Quality improvement studies
- Other reporting guidelines
- Reporting data
- Statistical methods and analyses
- Specific conditions or procedures
- Sections of research reports
- Reporting guidelines under development
- Reporting guidelines in other research fields
- Guidance on scientific writing
- Guidance developed by editorial groups
- Research funders' guidance on reporting requirements
- Industry sponsored research - additional guidance
- Research ethics, publication ethics and good practice guidelines
- Development and maintenance of reporting guidelines
- Editorials introducing RGs
- Examples of guidelines for peer reviewers
- Case studies: RG implementation
- Examples of good research reporting
- Presentations
- EQUATOR 'pick'
- Reporting Guidelines
- Authors of research reports
- Editors and peer reviewers
- Reporting guidelines developers
- Promote responsible reporting
- Monitoring use of our resources
- Links
Guidelines for reporting mixed methods studies
| Reporting guidance provided for: | Name of guideline website (where available) | References including PMID |
|---|---|---|
|
Mixed methods
|
O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13(2):92-8. PMID: 18416914 |
|
| Mixed research in counselling (quantitative and qualitative) |
|
Leech NL, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Guidelines for conducting and reporting mixed research in the field of counseling and beyond. Journal of Counseling and Development 2010; 88(1):61-9. |
Page last edited: 13 March 2012
