Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
Professor Dorothy Bishop shares her own experience of sharing her research data. She finds that despite making a great effort to be accurate error is inevitable and unavoidable in science, however careful you try to be. The best way to flush out these errors is to make the data publicly available. Read More28/02/2014 S. Kirtley: Can librarians contribute to increasing value and reducing waste in medical research?
The recently published Lancet series on waste in biomedical research provides a fascinating and thought provoking glimpse into the complex world of medical research and the myriad of issues that can disrupt completion and use of high quality research Read More20/12/2013 D. Riley: The CARE guidelines
We created a consensus-based set of reporting guidelines for case reports to increase the quality of reporting from patient encounters and lead into a systematic data collection effort Read More26/11/2013 P. McCulloch: The IDEAL Collaboration
The IDEAL framework outlines a realistic view of how surgical interventions, medical devices and other complex interventions actually develop in practice. Evaluation needs to recognise these stages of development, and both reporting standards and methodology need to be tailored Read More20/03/2013 T.A. Lang & D.G. Altman: Introducing the SAMPL guidelines
The SAMPL Guidelines provide a set of statistical reporting guidelines suitable for medical journals to include in their Instructions for Authors. The guidelines tell authors, journal editors, and reviewers how to report basic statistical methods and results Read More
In a previous post detailing my time with the EQUATOR Network, I spoke about my work on the STrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. STROBE is one of the original “core” reporting guidelines which provides guidance...