Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

Website translation help
Navigate this website
Home > Library > Reporting guideline

Search Results for:

The STARD-AI reporting guideline for diagnostic accuracy studies using artificial intelligence

Development, Evaluation, and Assessment of Large Language Models (DEAL) Checklist

Clinician-informed explainable artificial intelligence evaluation checklist with metrics (CLIX-M) for AI-powered clinical decision support systems

The GREENBEAN checklist for reporting studies evaluating the effectiveness of EEG-based biomarkers

Moving Forward on Tumor Pathology Research Reporting: A Guide for Pathologists From the World Health Organization Classification of Tumors Living Evidence Gap Map by Tumour Type Group

Guideline for RSA and CT-RSA implant migration measurements: an update of standardizations and recommendations

PRIDASE 2024 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in endodontics: A consensus-based development

Consolidated Reporting Guidelines for Prognostic and Diagnostic Machine Learning Modeling Studies: Development and Validation

Expert consensus document: Reporting checklist for quantification of pulmonary congestion by lung ultrasound in heart failure

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data: TRIPOD-Cluster checklist

Evidence-based statistical analysis and methods in biomedical research (SAMBR) checklists according to design features

Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing

EULAR points to consider for minimal reporting requirements in synovial tissue research in rheumatology

Standardized Reporting of Machine Learning Applications in Urology: The STREAM-URO Framework

Intraoperative fluorescence diagnosis in the brain: a systematic review and suggestions for future standards on reporting diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility

STAndard Reporting of CAries Detection and Diagnostic Studies (STARCARDDS)

The APOSTEL 2.0 Recommendations for Reporting Quantitative Optical Coherence Tomography Studies

Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration

EULAR recommendations for the reporting of ultrasound studies in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs)

Consolidated criteria for strengthening reporting of health research involving indigenous peoples: the CONSIDER statement

RECORDS: Improved reporting of Monte Carlo Radiation transport studies: Report of the AAPM Research Committee Task Group 268

STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts

STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

Guidelines for Developing and Reporting Machine Learning Predictive Models in Biomedical Research: A Multidisciplinary View

STARD-BLCM: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class Models

REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK)

Reporting studies on time to diagnosis: proposal of a guideline by an international panel (REST)

SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee

Consensus guidelines on plasma cell myeloma minimal residual disease analysis and reporting

An extension of STARD statements for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies on liver fibrosis tests: the Liver-FibroSTARD standards

RiGoR: reporting guidelines to address common sources of bias in risk model development

TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods

Reporting guidance for violence risk assessment predictive validity studies: the RAGEE Statement

Reporting standards for studies of diagnostic test accuracy in dementia: The STARDdem Initiative.

Consensus-based reporting standards for diagnostic test accuracy studies for paratuberculosis in ruminants

Suggestions for improving the reporting of clinical research: the role of narrative

The STARD statement for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: application to the history and physical examination

Strengthening the reporting of Genetic RIsk Prediction Studies: the GRIPS Statement