Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
Use your browser's Back button to return to your search results
|Reporting guideline provided for?
(i.e. exactly what the authors state in the paper)
|To improve the consistency, rigour and reporting of organizational case study research, without constraining methodological freedom, thereby making it more accessible and useful to different audiences.|
|Full bibliographic reference||Rodgers M, Thomas S, Harden M, Parker G, Street A, Eastwood A. Developing a methodological framework for organisational case studies: a rapid review and consensus development process. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2016;4(1).|
(full-text if available)
|The full-text of this guideline is available from: http://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/volume-4/issue-1#table-of-contents
The reporting checklist is available from: http://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/volume-4/issue-1#chapters/4/table11
|Study design||Mixed methods studies, Observational studies, Qualitative research, Quality improvement studies|
|Applies to the whole report or to individual sections of the report?||Data, Procedure/Method, Results, Statistical methods and analyses|
|Record last updated on||January 11, 2016|
|Diagnostic / prognostic studies||STARD||TRIPOD|
|Quality improvement studies||SQUIRE|
|Animal pre-clinical studies||ARRIVE|
|Clinical practice guidelines||AGREE||RIGHT|
Some reporting guidelines are also available in languages other than English. Find out more in our Translations section.
For information about Library scope and content, identification of reporting guidelines and inclusion/exclusion criteria please visit About the Library.
Visit our Help page for information about searching for reporting guidelines and for general information about using our website.
Our full catalogue of reporting guidelines is available to download as a PDF: Reporting Guideline Catalogue May 2014.