Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
Use your browser's Back button to return to your search results
|Reporting guideline provided for?
(i.e. exactly what the authors state in the paper)
|Defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources|
|Full bibliographic reference||Berger ML, Mamdani M, Atkins D, Johnson ML. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: Defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: The ISPOR good research practices for retrospective database analysis task force report - Part i. Value Health. 2009;12(8):1044-1052.|
|Study design||Clinical trials, Experimental studies, Observational studies, Other|
|Applies to the whole report or to individual sections of the report?||Whole report|
|Record last updated on||October 23, 2013|
|Diagnostic / prognostic studies||STARD||TRIPOD|
|Quality improvement studies||SQUIRE|
|Animal pre-clinical studies||ARRIVE|
|Clinical practice guidelines||AGREE||RIGHT|
For information about Library scope and content, identification of reporting guidelines and inclusion/exclusion criteria please visit About the Library.
Visit our Help page for information about searching for reporting guidelines and for general information about using our website.
Our full catalogue of reporting guidelines is available to download as a PDF: Reporting Guideline Catalogue May 2014.