Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

Website translation help
Navigate this website
Home > Library > Reporting guideline > Can the Brighton Collaboration case definitions be used to improve the quality of Adverse Event Following Immunization (AEFI) reporting? Anaphylaxis as a case study

Search for reporting guidelines

Use your browser's Back button to return to your search results

Can the Brighton Collaboration case definitions be used to improve the quality of Adverse Event Following Immunization (AEFI) reporting? Anaphylaxis as a case study

Reporting guideline provided for?
(i.e. exactly what the authors state in the paper)		 Definitions for reporting adverse events following immunizations
Full bibliographic reference Gold MS, Gidudu J, Erlewyn-Lajeunesse M, Law B; Brighton Collaboration Working Group on Anaphylaxis. Can the Brighton Collaboration case definitions be used to improve the quality of Adverse Event Following Immunization (AEFI) reporting? Anaphylaxis as a case study. Vaccine. 2010;28(28):4487-4498.
Language English
PubMed ID 20434547
Clinical area Infectious diseases
Applies to the whole report or to individual sections of the report? Harms/adverse effects/safety data, Terminology/definitions
Record last updated on August 16, 2016

Reporting guidelines for main study types

Translations

Some reporting guidelines are also available in languages other than English. Find out more in our Translations section.

About the Library

For information about Library scope and content, identification of reporting guidelines and inclusion/exclusion criteria please visit About the Library.

Visit our Help page for information about searching for reporting guidelines and for general information about using our website.

Library index