Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
Search for reporting guidelines
Use your browser's Back button to return to your search results
An analysis of preclinical efficacy testing of antivenoms for sub -Saharan Africa: Inadequate independent scrutiny and poor-quality reporting are barriers to improving snakebite treatment and management
| Reporting guideline provided for? (i.e. exactly what the authors state in the paper) |
Reporting preclinical antivenom efficacy. |
| Full bibliographic reference | Ainsworth S, Menzies SK, Casewell NR, Harrison RA. An analysis of preclinical efficacy testing of antivenoms for sub-Saharan Africa: Inadequate independent scrutiny and poor-quality reporting are barriers to improving snakebite treatment and management. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(8):e0008579. |
| Language | English |
| PubMed ID | 32817682 |
| Study design | Animal pre-clinical research |
| Clinical area | Tropical medicine |
| Applies to the whole report or to individual sections of the report? | Procedure/Method, Results, Study characteristics (participants etc.) |
| Record last updated on | March 15, 2021 |