Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research

Search for reporting guidelines

Use your browser's Back button to return to your search results

Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: Defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources

Reporting guideline provided for?
(i.e. exactly what the authors state in the paper)
Defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources
Full bibliographic reference Berger ML, Mamdani M, Atkins D, Johnson ML. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: Defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: The ISPOR good research practices for retrospective database analysis task force report - Part i. Value Health. 2009;12(8):1044-1052.
Language English
PubMed ID 19793072
Study design Clinical trials, Experimental studies, Observational studies, Other
Applies to the whole report or to individual sections of the report? Whole report
Record last updated on October 23, 2013

Translations

Some reporting guidelines are also available in languages other than English. Find out more in our Translations section.

About the Library

For information about Library scope and content, identification of reporting guidelines and inclusion/exclusion criteria please visit About the Library.

Visit our Help page for information about searching for reporting guidelines and for general information about using our website.