Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
Search for reporting guidelines
Use your browser's Back button to return to your search results
Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: Defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources
| Reporting guideline provided for? (i.e. exactly what the authors state in the paper) |
Defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources |
| Full bibliographic reference | Berger ML, Mamdani M, Atkins D, Johnson ML. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: Defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: The ISPOR good research practices for retrospective database analysis task force report - Part i. Value Health. 2009;12(8):1044-1052. |
| Language | English |
| PubMed ID | 19793072 |
| Study design | Clinical trials, Experimental studies, Observational studies, Other |
| Applies to the whole report or to individual sections of the report? | Whole report |
| Record last updated on | October 23, 2013 |