Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
Use your browser's Back button to return to your search results
|Reporting guideline provided for?
(i.e. exactly what the authors state in the paper)
|Defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources
|Full bibliographic reference
|Berger ML, Mamdani M, Atkins D, Johnson ML. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: Defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: The ISPOR good research practices for retrospective database analysis task force report - Part i. Value Health. 2009;12(8):1044-1052.
|Clinical trials, Experimental studies, Observational studies, Other
|Applies to the whole report or to individual sections of the report?
|Record last updated on
|October 23, 2013
Some reporting guidelines are also available in languages other than English. Find out more in our Translations section.