Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
Use your browser's Back button to return to your search results
| Reporting guideline provided for? (i.e. exactly what the authors state in the paper) |
Reporting the key resources used to produce the scientific findings reported in the biomedical literature such as antibodies, model organisms, and software projects. |
| Full bibliographic reference | Vasilevsky NA, Brush MH, Paddock H, Ponting L, Tripathy SJ, LaRocca GM, Haendel MA. On the reproducibility of science: unique identification of research resources in the biomedical literature. PeerJ. 2013;1:e148. |
| Language | English |
| PubMed ID | 24032093 |
| Relevant URLs (full-text if available) |
The full-text of this reporting guideline is freely available at: https://peerj.com/articles/148/ Access the summary reporting guideline checklist at: https://www.force11.org/group/resource-identification-initiative/recommended-reporting-guidelines-life-science-resources |
| Reporting guideline website URL | https://www.force11.org/group/resource-identification-initiative/ |
| Applies to the whole report or to individual sections of the report? | Biospecimen/bioresource information |
| Other | Read about this initiative: Bandrowski A, Brush M, Grethe JS et al. The Resource Identification Initiative: A cultural shift in publishing [version 2; referees: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2015, 4:134. PMID: 26594330 |
| Additional information | The Resource Identification Portal is available at: http://scicrunch.com/resources |
| Selected relevant editorials | Bandrowski AE, Martone ME. RRIDs: A Simple Step toward Improving Reproducibility through Rigor and Transparency of Experimental Methods. Neuron. 2016;90(3):434-6. PMID: 27151636 |
| Record last updated on | November 23, 2021 |