Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
Use your browser's Back button to return to your search results
Reporting guideline provided for? (i.e. exactly what the authors state in the paper) |
Reporting the key resources used to produce the scientific findings reported in the biomedical literature such as antibodies, model organisms, and software projects. |
Full bibliographic reference | Vasilevsky NA, Brush MH, Paddock H, Ponting L, Tripathy SJ, LaRocca GM, Haendel MA. On the reproducibility of science: unique identification of research resources in the biomedical literature. PeerJ. 2013;1:e148. |
Language | English |
PubMed ID | 24032093 |
Relevant URLs (full-text if available) |
The full-text of this reporting guideline is freely available at: https://peerj.com/articles/148/ Access the summary reporting guideline checklist at: https://www.force11.org/group/resource-identification-initiative/recommended-reporting-guidelines-life-science-resources |
Reporting guideline website URL | https://www.force11.org/group/resource-identification-initiative/ |
Applies to the whole report or to individual sections of the report? | Biospecimen/bioresource information |
Other | Read about this initiative: Bandrowski A, Brush M, Grethe JS et al. The Resource Identification Initiative: A cultural shift in publishing [version 2; referees: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2015, 4:134. PMID: 26594330 |
Additional information | The Resource Identification Portal is available at: http://scicrunch.com/resources |
Selected relevant editorials | Bandrowski AE, Martone ME. RRIDs: A Simple Step toward Improving Reproducibility through Rigor and Transparency of Experimental Methods. Neuron. 2016;90(3):434-6. PMID: 27151636 |
Record last updated on | November 23, 2021 |